Code Smells: Understanding Design Evolution in Modern Software Development

Hussein Mhadi
4 min readFeb 16, 2025

--

Photo by Florian Olivo on Unsplash

In the ever-evolving landscape of software development. Code smells, concept introduced by Kent Beck in the late 1990s serve as critical indicators of potential design weaknesses. While not bugs in the traditional sense, these patterns can significantly impact system maintainability and reliability. Through Martin Fowler’s influential work ‘Refactoring,’ the software development community gained a systematic framework for identifying and addressing these design concerns, broadly categorized into patterns within individual classes and those between classes.

The evolution of software development practices has introduced automated tools and continuous integration processes that actively identify and flag these patterns. This shift represents a broader movement in software engineering — one that prioritizes long-term maintainability over quick, temporary solutions. In this article we will discuss the first part of the topic, which is the code smell that occurs within classes, with simple examples in C# so that the explanation is clear.

The smell inside the classes

When examining within-class code smells, we encounter several critical patterns. For example, consider excessive commenting, which often masks unclear code structure. Rather than serving as documentation, these comments frequently indicate that the code itself lacks clarity and self-documentation. Modern software development emphasizes code that clearly expresses its intent through well-structured methods and meaningful naming conventions. Each of these patterns represents a common design challenge that, when properly addressed, can significantly improve code quality and maintainability. These critical patterns can be placed in specific labels, it including:

Comments Code Smell

The issue here is using comments to explain complicated code instead of making the code self-documenting. Here’s an example:

Long Method

This code smell occurs when a method does too many things. Here’s an example:

Long Parameter List

This smell occurs when a method has too many parameters. Here’s how to fix it:

Large Classes

This smell happens when a class has too many responsibilities:

Duplicate Code

This smell occurs when you have the same code in multiple places:

Conclusion

Through our exploration of code smells within classes, we’ve seen how these common patterns can impact software quality and maintainability. From excessive comments masking unclear code to methods that stretch beyond their intended purpose, each pattern presents unique challenges that modern software development practices aim to address. The examples in C# demonstrate not just the problems, but also practical solutions that align with contemporary software engineering principles.

By addressing these code smells through proper refactoring techniques, developers can create more maintainable, clearer, and more efficient code bases. The transformation from problematic patterns to well-structured solutions shows how modern software development has evolved to prioritize long-term sustainability over quick fixes. This approach not only improves code quality but also reduces technical debt and makes systems more adaptable to future changes.

For more information:
1- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code” (1999) by Martin Fowler
2- Code Smells: A Synthetic Narrative Review
3-Code Smells and Refactoring: A Tertiary Systematic Review of Challenges and Observations

--

--

Hussein Mhadi
Hussein Mhadi

Written by Hussein Mhadi

Software Engineer/Architect 💡 Founder programmercoffee.xyz☕ Web Developer ,Architecting Solutions,Consulting & Team Leadership 🎯 Writer and Trainer 🔥

No responses yet